12:03 < jds2001> alrighty then, who's still around for this fun? 12:03 * snecklifter is here 12:04 * nirik is here. 12:04 * inode0 is here for uncertain reasons 12:04 * poelcat here 12:04 * wwoods is here.. ish 12:05 * owentl is here 12:05 * EvilBob is here still 12:05 < jds2001> alrigh - first I'm happy to report that the bug count is below 13,000 for all releases of Fedora! 12:05 < jds2001> 12,922 as of a few minutes ago 12:05 < nirik> cool... from what high point? 12:06 < jds2001> i think when i started it was around 13,500 12:06 -!- ceplma [i=fjoxluch@nezmar.netlab.cz] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:06 < nirik> Cool... 12:07 < jds2001> full stats can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Meetings/Agenda-2008-Jan-23 12:07 * snecklifter takes all the credit as this is clearly down to kernel bugs 12:07 < jds2001> i just put em there 12:07 -!- dwmw2_gone is now known as dwmw2_ULN 12:08 * inode0 reads link and knows why he is here now 12:08 < jds2001> next is why inode0 is here....let's brainstorm about ways to get university students involved 12:08 < poelcat> wasn't there someone that posts to the fedora lists about running special debug version of certain programs and resporting results? 12:09 < poelcat> he was from a university as part of a class he taught 12:09 < snecklifter> current channels into academia are what? 12:09 < jds2001> inode0 is a channel into iastate 12:09 < inode0> unviersity folks have been chatting with some RH and Fedora folks on the redhat academic list about various things including how to promote student involvement 12:09 -!- fcrippa [n=fcrippa@host124-185-dynamic.45-213-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has quit ["Leaving"] 12:09 < snecklifter> inode0: that would be a good start then 12:09 < wwoods> poelcat: that's CBI, the Cooperative Bug Isolation project 12:10 < wwoods> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/cbi/ 12:10 < snecklifter> yum-utils has debuginfo-install utility 12:10 -!- ceplma [i=fjoxluch@nezmar.netlab.cz] has left #fedora-meeting [] 12:10 < inode0> we want to reach out to artists and other non-traditional contributors 12:10 < poelcat> I wonder if students there would be interested in helping out 12:10 < snecklifter> which installs all debuginfo packages required for stack traces 12:10 < jds2001> hmm, didnt know about that snecklifter 12:10 < snecklifter> http://www.chruz.com/2008/01/22/when-firefox-crashes-and-burns/ 12:11 < inode0> these students tend to just not know about opportunities or if they do who to talk to about them 12:11 < snecklifter> jds2001: just blogged about it yesterday but is very useful and needs more prominence 12:11 * nirik loves debuginfo-install... makes it very nice to ask reporters to duplicate. 12:12 < poelcat> nirik: is there a wiki page on how to use it? 12:12 < snecklifter> so the uni students could debug as a way of understanding how apps and OS works 12:12 < jds2001> or even not that 12:12 < inode0> others at MIT and elsewhere are also interested in helping mentor students at least in the area of matching students up with projects they could contribute to 12:12 < jds2001> those would be so-called traditional contirbutor 12:12 < nirik> poelcat: not sure. It's basically just 'yum install yum-utils; debuginfo-install packagename' and it will install debuginfo for package and everything it depends on. 12:12 < snecklifter> poelcat: not really, just debuginfo-install kernel 12:13 * nirik loves the idea of getting students more involved... 12:13 < snecklifter> or whatever app 12:13 -!- ceplma_ [n=matej@ppp1053.in.ipex.cz] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:13 < inode0> we are looking for some help in getting the word out to campus as most of "us" don't have much direct contact with these students 12:13 < snecklifter> should be a good first start for uni students 12:13 < poelcat> what about involvement from Seneca--I think it was ctyler I met at fudcon 12:14 < jds2001> Seneca would be an excellent place since they already have a program 12:14 < snecklifter> universities tend to have good bandwidth as well so d/l all debuginfo stuff shouldn't hopefully be an issue 12:14 < jds2001> but again, those are going to be more "traditional" type folks 12:14 < jds2001> at seneeca that is. 12:14 < snecklifter> A lot of LUGS are run in conjunction with universities... 12:14 -!- JSchmitt [n=s4504kr@p54B12A15.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:15 < inode0> we need to promote involvement with more traditional students too, just don't want it to just be CS and ENGR people we reach out to 12:15 * snecklifter will mail some local lug lists and see what the response is 12:15 < poelcat> so it sounds like we need a list of people and then we create a wiki summarizing our pitch to point folks to? 12:15 < inode0> lugs where I am reach a tiny number of the traditional student category and zero from outside it 12:16 < snecklifter> poelcat: yes, with specific academia-oriented stuff 12:16 < inode0> poelcat: and if the wiki could be more open to all of fedora that would be great 12:16 < jds2001> the question that we have - how to best market ourselves to academia 12:17 < jds2001> inode0: not sure what you mean there? 12:17 < inode0> the art team could certainly have contributors from student artists 12:17 < inode0> SoC projects need to reach students so they are aware of them 12:17 < snecklifter> jds2001: easy, andrew morton said the best way to learn (kernel) programming is to fix bugs 12:17 < inode0> and so on 12:18 < snecklifter> so there's the pitch I guess 12:18 < snecklifter> In a whole distribution every aspect of CS can be addressed 12:18 < jds2001> yea, but keep in mind that the demographic that we're trying to reach is not going to be able to or even interested in fixing any sort of bugs 12:18 < snecklifter> so games programmers can check out games bugs etc 12:18 -!- kital [n=Joerg_Si@fedora/kital] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:18 < jds2001> my target demographic for this outreach is non-coders 12:19 < nirik> but they should be fedora users, right? 12:19 < jds2001> they should be, yes. 12:19 < snecklifter> jds2001: oh? 12:19 < jds2001> snecklifter: you dont need to know how to write a line of code in order to effectively triage. 12:19 < inode0> my goal is just to reach out to talented young people and make them aware of the philosophy and opportunities available, both technical and non-technical 12:20 < snecklifter> jds2001: accepted but i thought this was the reason for specifically aiming at students 12:20 < jds2001> snecklifter: the aim at students is more that there's a huge population there that goes untapped 12:20 < inode0> basic triaging is one of the places someone intimidated by more technical things could help some 12:20 < jds2001> and pretty much everywhere else, too. 12:21 < inode0> and while helping gain confidence in more technical contributions as well 12:21 < snecklifter> okay, then lets put together that wiki page and review it at next week's meeting? 12:21 < poelcat> +1 12:22 < jds2001> yep 12:22 < nirik> +1 12:22 < jds2001> inode0: probably need your help with that 12:22 < snecklifter> cool, perhaps we should move on as time is moving... 12:22 < jds2001> this is going to be a "who are we targeting" type thihg. 12:22 < inode0> jds2001: ok, we can talk later about details 12:22 < jds2001> yeah, i dindt realize the time :) 12:23 < snecklifter> no wonder the qa people overrun :) 12:23 < snecklifter> next, wiki cleanup perhaps? 12:23 < jds2001> lol they took 2 hours :) 12:23 < jds2001> yes 12:23 < snecklifter> poelcat: awesome job on that, jds2001 tells me it is all your work 12:23 < poelcat> i've made some progress... would like to help with more 12:23 < poelcat> but I need a deadline or it will never get done :) 12:24 < snecklifter> okay, next weeks meeting :) 12:24 < poelcat> lol 12:24 < poelcat> okay 12:24 < jds2001> hehe do you need some help or are you better left alone? 12:24 < poelcat> hmm 12:24 < poelcat> hard to say 12:24 < poelcat> my goal is to keep it really simple and streamlined 12:24 < snecklifter> poelcat: nice 12:24 < poelcat> with bite-szie pages 12:24 < snecklifter> +1 12:25 < poelcat> not the pages that scroll 4-10 pages deep 12:25 < jmn> Is there a list of root pages that we'd like to target for cleanup (for those of us who are new here and haven't paid enough attention to the Wiki)? 12:25 < poelcat> and filled with too much unnecessary info 12:25 < jds2001> +1 12:25 < snecklifter> keep talking baby 12:25 < jds2001> jmn: here we're just talking about the bug triage pages 12:25 < poelcat> just a sec 12:25 < jmn> "the bug triage pages" sort of works here :) 12:26 < poelcat> i'm keeping a map here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/TriageIdeas1 12:26 < poelcat> at the top 12:26 < snecklifter> jmn: we're hoping to get things down to a central point 12:26 < jmn> Of course. I love it when a CPA crosses over to high tech. 12:26 < poelcat> ideally there is little to no overlap in topics... use hrefs to other pages 12:26 < jds2001> snecklifter: I've been meaning to do that to the kernel triage page as well 12:26 < snecklifter> I'll chat to the kernel bods about moving the kernel one 12:26 < snecklifter> jds2001: heh 12:26 < jds2001> it needs to go on a diet :) 12:27 -!- rahul_b [n=rbhalera@123.236.177.158] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:27 < snecklifter> jds2001: If there is redundant stuff then lose it but I refer to it a lot 12:28 < poelcat> what do people think about a special wiki page focused on bugzilla queries 12:28 < poelcat> to target different cross sections of bugs to triage? 12:28 < jds2001> well like the assignee stuff can go on it's own page 12:28 < jds2001> +1 12:28 < poelcat> AND can someone provide said query links? :) 12:28 < snecklifter> poelcat: +1 12:28 < jds2001> hehe i've had that action item since Sat 12:29 * jmn volunteers to help 12:29 < jds2001> and i still havne't done a heck of a lot with it. 12:29 < snecklifter> like at the top of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage ? 12:29 < poelcat> jds2001: you mean you didn't work all day sat and sun like last week? 12:29 < jds2001> snecklifter: yep, something like that 12:29 < poelcat> ;-) 12:29 < snecklifter> with links to F7 bugs? 12:30 < snecklifter> I like that, perhaps we could diversify by package base group such as Sound & Video, Office etc 12:30 < jds2001> F7, F8, and rawhide 12:30 < nirik> there are some links in the package report... 12:30 < snecklifter> Okay, I'll bag that task for next week 12:31 < jds2001> speaking of the package report a link to a report of maintainers would be nice too. 12:31 < nirik> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus 12:31 < poelcat> snecklifter: i stubbed out a page called BugZappers/FindingBugs 12:31 < nirik> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus#head-181b0c70022aca0d7aa42d42f7ed12a553189882 12:31 < jds2001> the "maintainers that need help" thing 12:32 < snecklifter> poelcat: great, I'll use that 12:33 * nirik has noticed that pirut gets a ton of misfiled bugs... we can really help there with marking dups and refiling to the right component. 12:33 < snecklifter> nirik: what for? 12:33 < snecklifter> sorry i meant what is pirut getting the bugs from 12:33 < snecklifter> or what app should be getting them? 12:34 < nirik> well, people don't know the component name. I have seen them filed against p0f, the aaa* component thats at the top of the list, distribution, etc. 12:34 < jds2001> snecklifter: alot of them are yum bugs 12:34 < snecklifter> ah thought that might be it 12:34 < nirik> yeah, and that too. 12:35 < jds2001> imho there should be "meta-categories" like software update, etc 12:35 < nirik> yeah, that would be nice... 12:35 < snecklifter> hey, then we'd be out of a job :) 12:36 < jds2001> hehe 12:36 < snecklifter> If wiki stuff is all done can I mention installer bugs 12:36 < jds2001> sure 12:36 < snecklifter> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242956 12:36 < buggbot> Bug 242956: urgent, urgent, ---, Kernel Maintainer List, CLOSED CANTFIX, F7 CDROM installation method fails to recognize CD/DVD drive 12:37 < jds2001> that bug is a trainwreck 12:37 < snecklifter> jds2001: you knows it 12:37 < snecklifter> Does everyone think closing it in this method is fair? 12:38 < jds2001> well, Alan specifically stated he plans to do nothing about it. 12:38 < snecklifter> Alan Cox seemed to think so as did you jds2001 12:38 < snecklifter> My question is what happens with the inevitable F9 installer bug 12:38 < jds2001> or rather with that particular bug 12:39 < jds2001> split em out as best we can and have em block a metabug 12:39 < snecklifter> Someone starts one and every other person who cant install CC's themselves 12:39 < snecklifter> jds2001: catch them before they grow too big like the above? 12:39 < jds2001> yep 12:39 < EvilBob> Umm, that bug was fixed by Unity's Re-Spins using a newer kernel IIRC 12:40 < jmn> +1 for quick triage while the train is still on the track 12:40 < snecklifter> okay fair enough 12:40 < jds2001> note snecklifter and my suggestions to use a respin 12:40 < snecklifter> EvilBob: yeah, he seems to be refusing to test 12:40 < snecklifter> so maybe I'm making a mountain out of a molehill 12:40 < jds2001> and wanting codepaths to fix every possible regression 12:41 < EvilBob> If "we" (Unity) can be let know about these kind of bugs we will track them and fix them as we can 12:41 < wwoods> yeah, seriously, quick triage to split different bugs into actual different reports would go a long way 12:41 -!- smooge [n=smooge@canopus.unm.edu] has quit ["-ENOCAFFEINE"] 12:41 -!- ceplma_ [n=matej@ppp1053.in.ipex.cz] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 12:42 < snecklifter> EvilBob: okay, will see how we can co-ordinate that 12:42 < jmn> The mentality should be to open a new bug unless there is absolute proof that it's a dup. 12:42 < EvilBob> feel free to cc me bob@fedoraunity.org on these kind of things 12:42 < snecklifter> EvilBob: sounds good, it just depends on me remembering to do it 12:42 < jds2001> jmn: i agree, it's just that reporters dont feel that way sometimes. 12:42 < EvilBob> snecklifter: sure 12:42 < snecklifter> :/ 12:42 < jmn> jds2001: Well, that's where we come in :). 12:43 < jds2001> they'll just tack on to another existing report.... 12:43 -!- ceplma_ [n=matej@ppp1053.in.ipex.cz] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:43 < snecklifter> EvilBob: are you okay on me adding your contact details to the wiki in regards to installer bugs then? 12:43 < EvilBob> snecklifter: yes 12:44 < snecklifter> okay, well I'm happy, next topic? 12:44 < jds2001> there is a FCMETA_INSTALL too 12:44 < jds2001> i dunno how useful that is at this point, maybe just make a new one for F9 12:44 < snecklifter> jds2001: ah yeah I used that a lot 12:45 < EvilBob> snecklifter: by leading the Spin team for unity, working with the anaconda and kernel guys for ideas is not a problem 12:45 < inode0> after getting a bunch of new bzs flagged as dups reporters start trying to avoid that too 12:46 < snecklifter> EvilBob: awesome - of course it would be good to get stuff fixed for release but Unity stuff has been a great solution for a lot of people 12:46 < snecklifter> EvilBob: Torrents would be awesome however as jigdo seems to intimidate some 12:47 < jds2001> well in the QA meeting it was just mentioned that infinite resources aren't there :) 12:47 < jds2001> snecklifter: i thought the unity folks were talking about getting iso's on the mirrors 12:47 < EvilBob> snecklifter: when it comes to that we do not have the resources needed to seed 12:47 < snecklifter> jds2001: news to me but +1 12:48 < jds2001> wwoods for example doesn't have dmraid hardware to test with.... 12:48 < snecklifter> torrents are fire-and-forget d/ling which most seem to prefer 12:48 < inode0> is unity separately mirrored? 12:48 < EvilBob> jds2001: it is something we are working for, and if BT appens with that we are all for it 12:48 < EvilBob> inode0: yes 12:49 < inode0> lots of unis can help with mirror ... torrents are more problematic for us politically 12:49 < EvilBob> inode0: Unity is totally separate from Fedora Project 12:49 < inode0> ok, I'll poke our mirror person 12:49 < EvilBob> inode0: thanks 12:49 < EvilBob> did not mean to derail the meeting 12:50 -!- kital [n=Joerg_Si@fedora/kital] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 12:50 < jds2001> not a problem 12:50 < snecklifter> bugzilla stats, whats the latest and do we want them? 12:50 -!- owentl [n=owentl@c-98-195-5-158.hsd1.tx.comcast.net] has quit ["Leaving"] 12:50 < jds2001> i think we agreed that we needed them at our last meeting 12:51 < jds2001> i was going to look into throwing some stuff into rrdtool 12:51 < snecklifter> jds2001: which I wasn't at 12:51 < snecklifter> mea culpa 12:51 < jds2001> for now, it's on the agenda wiki page for each meeting 12:51 < jds2001> lol the logs are published :) 12:51 < snecklifter> nice 12:51 < jds2001> read your mail :) 12:52 < poelcat> jds2001: can you include stats from previous collection so that we an see context/trend? 12:52 < snecklifter> nah, all goes /dev/null 12:52 < snecklifter> any news on getting csv reports from bugzilla de-cookified? 12:53 < jds2001> wwoods: ping 12:53 < poelcat> IOW create a separate table for each release and then each column will be the date 12:53 < jds2001> ok, that'll work.... 12:54 < wwoods> what? 12:54 < wwoods> csv reports from bugzilla, eh 12:54 < snecklifter> had an interesting few moments with gnuplot earlier trying to get a graph going? 12:54 < jds2001> i want my csv reports de-cookified :) 12:54 < snecklifter> wwoods: yah 12:54 < wwoods> I'll ask dkl 12:54 < wwoods> when he gets back from lunch 12:54 -!- giallu [n=giallu@81-174-9-209.dynamic.ngi.it] has joined #fedora-meeting 12:54 < jds2001> also i way to save them so that I don't used 1.3K for each URL :) 12:55 < jds2001> that's pretty monsterous for a URL :) 12:55 < snecklifter> you can just grab it from a url file 12:55 < jds2001> that's what i do :) 12:56 < snecklifter> if we can get the data out of bugzilla w/o cookies then we should be laughing 12:57 < snecklifter> 3 mins left 12:57 < jds2001> well i can grab the data ung my ff cookies, but then the next time i use ff it complains that the cookies are bogus 12:57 < snecklifter> jds2001: yep, same here 12:57 < snecklifter> tried cp, rsync to copy but firefox seems to know the cookies have been touched 12:57 < jds2001> no, it's not ff that complains for me, it's bugzilla 12:57 < snecklifter> and we need to run it from server ideally so no need for ff login 12:58 < snecklifter> sorry, i meant bz 12:58 < jds2001> anyhow, anyoine skilled in pyGTK wanna write a triage client? 12:59 < jds2001> wwoods and i tossed around the idea at fudcon, but no one has time :) 12:59 < snecklifter> Not my area of expertise and since the bz update its running faster so I'm pretty happy with browser interface 12:59 < jds2001> poelcat: anything else we need to discuss here? 12:59 < wwoods> It'd be a rad summer of code project, probably 13:00 < poelcat> jds2001: think that is it... next week plan to review wiki pages and set some training dates? 13:00 < snecklifter> I'm done. That went quick 13:00 < jds2001> snecklifter: this would integrate koji, bodhi, bz, pkgdb, etc 13:01 < snecklifter> jds2001: someone is working on something like that 13:01 < poelcat> assuming training would be based on and point to wiki pages 13:01 < snecklifter> maybe J5 13:01 < poelcat> jds2001: also the bug life cycle is up up for review at FESCo on thurs 13:01 < nirik> jds2001: we should come up with a requirements for fedorabugs? its been suggested we just require cla_done and approve anyone who does that until there is a problem... 13:02 < poelcat> that would be good to have ready for Thurs' meeting too 13:02 < snecklifter> nirik: sounds good - will they need a mentor or some such? 13:02 < jds2001> nirik: forgot about that. That sounds somewhat reasonable for me. 13:03 < nirik> well, adding the overhead of sponsorship might cause some people to not want to join and help... 13:03 < jds2001> a mentor would be nice, though (aka sponsor, but maybe a little less formal that package maintainers, etc) 13:03 < jds2001> not really an overhead - you jsut apply for membership sponsors get mail, approve, and mentor 13:03 < snecklifter> well, perhaps we could CC ourselves into their bugs for a bit 13:03 < nirik> whats involved in mentoring though? ] 13:03 < snecklifter> or one of us at least 13:04 < nirik> watching bugzilla for their changes? 13:04 < snecklifter> I think there is a watch email address option in bz 13:04 < snecklifter> nirik: thats it 13:04 < jds2001> mentoring could be as simple as "ping me if you need help" 13:04 < nirik> thats a lot of overhead on the mentor part. 13:04 -!- snavin [n=snavin@124.43.62.202] has quit ["Leaving"] 13:04 < nirik> yeah, I would support that fine... 13:04 < snecklifter> I'm okay with it - it would only be for a week or so to make sure they're not going nuts 13:05 < nirik> well, we have 39 people waiting in the queue. You want to watch all their bugzilla activity? 13:05 < jds2001> nirik: i'll probably do that for ppl that i approve anyways. 13:05 < snecklifter> nirik: 39 people waiting for fedorabugs access? 13:05 < nirik> jds2001: cool... :) 13:05 < nirik> snecklifter: yes 13:05 < jds2001> i can do all of those tonight. 13:05 < poelcat> nirik: were you going to look at finding out how to modify bugbot? 13:06 < snecklifter> wow, didn't realise that 13:06 < jds2001> just check em for cla_done first.... 13:06 < nirik> jds2001: did the one person you approved go thru correctly? 13:06 < jds2001> nirik: i think so, havent heard from him 13:06 < snecklifter> it would be good to get those cleared 13:06 < nirik> yeah. 13:06 < jds2001> i mean FAS took it fine. 13:06 < nirik> oh, was meaning to ask... what buggbot mod did you guys need? or should we take it to fedora-qa since time here is up? 13:07 < jds2001> and I get mail anytime someone applies... 13:07 < poelcat> nirik: i was thinking put it in a special channel 13:07 < snecklifter> Where is the list of people waiting for approval? 13:07 < poelcat> nirik: only report on bugs in NEW or that meet criteria we care about 13:08 < poelcat> the existing one is info_overload + stuff we don't care about 13:08 < nirik> poelcat: ok, mkant is the one to talk to about that. I can drop him an email since I seldom see him on irc 13:08 < poelcat> nirik: excellent 13:08 < nirik> snecklifter: in the fedora account system... 13:08 < poelcat> jds2001: re: fedorabugs we should iron out wiki pages on that 13:08 < poelcat> so people know exactly what to do and expect 13:09 * nirik nods 13:09 < jds2001> ok, i need to figure that out myself :) 13:09 < jds2001> cuz after my membership was approved, i didnt have all of the access that i needed, but it magically came later 13:09 < jds2001> i'll probably make a dummy acct in FAS just to check. 13:10 < nirik> there is a wait between approval of fedorabugs and bugzilla knowing about it. 13:10 < nirik> (cron job run or something) 13:10 < jds2001> right, abotu an hour. 13:10 < jds2001> i had membership in fedora_contrib after that time 13:10 < snecklifter> jds2001: you're a sponsor in FAS? 13:10 < jds2001> but not in like editbugs which is what you need. 13:10 < jds2001> snecklifter: yes 13:11 < jds2001> for fedoraabugs 13:13 < snecklifter> hmm, i'm not - just tried to apply and FAS spat the dummy with python errors 13:13 < jds2001> i'll probably make me a new FAS acct tonight, just to verify the process. 13:13 < jds2001> apply? You're already a member? 13:13 < jds2001> that would be why it spat python garbage 13:13 < snecklifter> user, not sponsor 13:14 < jds2001> oh, i *may* be able to fix that. If not, poelcat or nirik can 13:14 < snecklifter> go for it 13:14 < nirik> snecklifter: you want to be a sponsor there too? I have no idea what criteria we are using for that, but I can probibly make you a sponsor. 13:15 < nirik> might be best to ping Fesco tomorrow and formalize that, or at least get the go ahead for me to make people sponsors there. 13:15 < snecklifter> nirik: if you can make it happen it would be good 13:15 -!- kital [n=Joerg_Si@fedora/kital] has joined #fedora-meeting 13:15 < nirik> sponsors are good because you get the email about new people applying. Admins for the groups don't. 13:15 < snecklifter> okay, can ping bpepple to bring it up tomorrow? 13:16 < nirik> snecklifter: sure, or I can bring it up in the free discussion... or we can tack it on to the bug lifecycle thing? 13:17 -!- jnettlet [n=jnettlet@c-76-118-159-90.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit ["Ex-Chat"] 13:17 < jds2001> let's tack it onto the lifecycle discussion 13:17 < snecklifter> It would be good if a few of us will be watching new triagers 13:17 < nirik> for buggbot would it make sense to just have people do irc filters for #fedorabot for just triage things? then the info isn't duplicated and people don't need another channel? 13:18 < snecklifter> Wierd, I thought I had sponsor in fas already 13:18 < jds2001> maybe.... 13:18 < poelcat> nirik: that's a cool idea... how would that work? 13:18 < nirik> in fedorabugs? unlikely... there were only admins and users before... jds2001 is the only sponsor currently. 13:18 < poelcat> nirik can you supress/filter input for a particular channel? 13:19 < nirik> poelcat: problem might be all the varied irc clients people use... probibly have different ways to filter. 13:19 < nirik> yeah, xchat has something to do that. 13:19 * poelcat uses irsii and supresses all joins/leaves, etc. 13:19 < poelcat> makes channels quiet and clean 13:19 < jds2001> poelcat: nice except when you wanna know when folks come and go :) 13:20 < jds2001> i've got a $dayjob meeting in 10 minutesw 13:20 < snecklifter> speaking of which, its dinner time in merry england so unless there are any other topics? 13:20 -!- spoleeba [n=one@fedora/Jef] has joined #fedora-meeting 13:20 < jds2001> i'll post the log immediately and probably minutes later tonight